- #Firefox for windows 7 starter Pc#
- #Firefox for windows 7 starter windows 7#
- #Firefox for windows 7 starter windows#
It's simply second-rate compared to the others. If you're using IE, on the other hand, stop. That said, Opera is worth considering.Īs for Firefox, well it's OK, it's not great, but it's OK. Chrome came in second with 519, while Firefox was in third with 471? IE? You guessed it. Opera re-emerged to take first with 526 points. If your web browser has trouble with today's web standard, it doesn't matter how fast it is. A perfect score, which no one got, would have been 550. It just shows how close each browser comes to being in sync with the HTML5 standard. HTML5 Test: Finally, I checked to see how well each browser complies with the HTML5 web standard. And, once more, IE was in the back of the pack with 150 points. Firefox got the silver with a score of 183. On this test, Chrome took gold with 187 points. Here, the higher the score, the better the browser. It contains six HTML5- and JavaScript-based workloads: Photo Enhancement, Organize Album, Stock Option Pricing, Local Notes, Sales Graphs, and Explore DNA Sequencing. It uses scenarios created to mirror every day tasks. WebXPRT is today's most comprehensive browser benchmark. Far, far in the back IE limped to the end with a score of 7,778. Close behind it came Firefox with 14,157 points. Opera! This time it won with 14,863 points. On this benchmark, the higher the score, the better.Īnd, the winner was. For example, it tests how fast Microsoft's TypeScript compiles itself. Octane 2.0: Google's JavaScript benchmark also includes scenario testing for today's interactive web applications. Firefox was close on its heels with 2,850.4ms. Opera came in second with a score of 2,585.9ms. Here, Chrome came in first once more with with a score of 2,267.6 milliseconds (ms). With this benchmark, the lower the score, the better the result. Mozilla, Firefox's parent organization, created Kraken. To this basic JavaScript testing, it added typical use case scenarios. Kraken 1.1: This benchmark, which is descended from SunSpider, also measures JavaScript performance. Still, Opera has respectable turn of speed with 81.93.įirefox took third with 76.44. It now claims less than 2 percent of the desktop browser market. Opera has been declining in popularity for years. On this benchmark, larger scores are better.Ĭhrome, as it so often has in previous tests, won with a score of 85.26. It also includes a benchmark based on the Apache Harmony open-source project's HashMap and a port of the CDx real-time Java benchmark, hand-translated to JavaScript. This test suite also includes benchmarks from the LLVM compiler open-source project, compiled to JavaScript using Emscripten 1.13. JetStream includes benchmarks from the SunSpider 1.0.2 and Octane 2 JavaScript benchmark suites. It combines several JavaScript benchmarks to report a single score that balances them using geometric mean. JetStream 1.1: This JavaScript benchmark builds on the foundation of the obsolete SunSpider. The 2012 version of Safari, 5.1.7, with some security patches is still available, but it's too dated to use.įor each round of testings, I ran freshly installed vanilla web browsers after rebooting the system.
#Firefox for windows 7 starter windows#
I no longer test Safari because Apple doesn't release major Safari updates for Windows anymore. On this system, I benchmarked Internet Explorer (IE) 11, Chrome 56, Firefox 51, and Opera 43. It's hooked to the internet via a Gigabit Ethernet switch, which, in turn, is connected to a 100Mbps (Megabit per second) cable internet connection.
#Firefox for windows 7 starter Pc#
This older PC is powered by a 2.5-GHz Intel Core 2 Quad processor and has 6GB of RAM and an Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3100 for graphics.
#Firefox for windows 7 starter windows 7#
This ran on my Windows 7 test PC, a Gateway DX4710. To put Windows 7's web browsers to the test I put them through their paces on the latest shipping edition of Windows 7 SP 1 Ultimate.
0 kommentar(er)
